those who didn't vote in the primary

I talked with a couple of people who didn't vote in the primary. They said that they may have voted for Bernie Sanders but didn't because he wasn't going to win anyway. So they decided not to vote at all. I was aghast. What kind of thinking is that? If a couple of millions of people all felt the same way - that adds up. If all those millions of people who felt their vote didn't count, it may have helped him win if they actually went and voted. Uncovering there was a favoritism toward promoting Hillary within the Democratic party does show Bernie Sanders may not have an opportunity at all but still he would have had the votes.

I really saw Jon Huntsman as being the winner of this election and since he didn't run, my pick was Bernie Sanders. I voted in the primary. I can't believe there were people who just sat on the fence or thought their vote would't count. They sat out and kept their voice shut. Don't be passive. Don't be aggressive. Be assertive!!!

the foundation cannot be a poor majority & needs to be a richer one

because america over gave foreign aid that now america has to get foreign deals n investments-who will feeds america's poor if america cant?

there are grocery stores in each street corner stocked-yet hungry & the extreme poor can't get any nor is there enough food for poor countries -irresponsible IC

irresponsible inventory control & irresponsible consumption

what exactly is the struggle of the majority of the people in these united states?
What are we trying to achieve everyday? why are many just struggling to get by & live pay check to paycheck? why are many homeless & hungry? why?
-the government officials we elect seem to argue without reaching any solutions
or they seem to be influenced by lobbyists & corporations instead serving all of the people. the politicians rarely seem to be seeking workable solutions & instead choose to stagnate the flow of the system.


capitalism does not equal democracy-we can't think that over stuffing market with useless products is healthy & system can collapse so there needs to be a balance

many workable principals of capitalism should be applied, but pure capitalism does not work as pure 'any system' does not work in life.

we must incorporate workable principals of various financial systems to sustain a successful economy as well as have avenues for people to prosper

especially. in USA, it is easy to see that unbalance of the scale 1% vs 9% vs 30% vs 60% do not serve a majority as 1% are the mega wealth holders & 60% are closer to the poverty line-wake up & make responsible changes

rich

upper middle

middle class middle class

Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor

-how can the poor financially hold up the rich? esp. when there is no trickle down

buy buy buy attitudes only leaves those without much money only enough for rent/bare necessities & the poorest stressed & with lot of debt

system can collapse because the wealthy few keep getting richer creating a pyramid like scheme & lower layers won't be able to buy anymore

When lower layers wont be able to buy anymore & there is no $$ fed back into system by wealth hoarders -standstill will make it all crumble

see, the lower layer is the foundation -so if the foundation which is the poor majority is not strong -they can't hold up the rich so there -any builder knows it is the foundation that has to be strong - and in nature the strong roots hold up a tree

the lower majority has to be stronger - they need to have financial resources for the foundation to be strong & healthy therefore holding it all together

so the pyramid has to be 1% poor absolute destitute 9% somewhat poor 10% lower middle 20% upper middle class 60% rich & well off

1%

9%9%9%

10%10%10%

20%20%20%20%

60%60%60%60%60%

destitute
somewhat poor
lower middle class
upper middle class upper middle
rich rich rich rich rich rich wealthy wealthy rich

-sort of like a trickle up

then the foundation will be strong to support the US economy & any crumbling will be easily fixed

just because your grandpa's world wasn't thinking or looking at all sides when making decisions doesn't mean that we can't change things now

the financial foundation build upon a poor majority will crack & create a system collapse unless monetary solution is fed at the roots

my views are my own - not paid for by any organization or political individuals or lobbyists (c)

Abortion: Why is this such a tough issue?

(this is still a writing in progress-but i m putting it up while i work on it-- this is how i write i put ideas, main points, then try to make an essay or article will see if i can craft this better)

1.Abortion with regard to rape, incest & life of mother. 2.And abortion with regard to sexuality and regular sex, and because someone cannot afford a baby.
-These are two different topics and should be argued and viewed as such.

i think that rape abortion (life/choice) discussed policies topic is not same as contraceptives, abortions, sexual choices. 2 different things.

Rape abortion topic has become a big issue that it must be a separate issue.
You'd think that millions of women are raped or assulted every minute....

Fear of rape: having a choice makes women feel safe, if it happens, they have options.

1.  Morning After Pill


If a woman has sex & then after a few months decide she cannot afford the baby, or that she doesn't want the baby, or the male refuse to support an unplanned baby, then abortioning is morally wrong. They should have used contraceptives.


Think before act.

Case by Case

Contraceptives should be wildly available:


There are always campaigns for women to be safe and not provoke rape, but where
are the campaigns that tell men not to rape?

The rapers could be stunned


Common sense solutions are needed.


Abortion/Rape topic and Sexual decisions, contraceptives, abortions topic are two separate topics. And I strongly believe that they should not be argued in the same debate.

If We Don't Speak Up, Who Will?

RE:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/15/savage-muni-ad_n_1784930.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003


Who exactly is civilized man? It's based on individuals.You cannot say all of group X is civilized  because there are uncivilized jerks of every group. 

In the war between the civilized man & the savage. Don't support either! Support balance & love. Defeat hatred, bias, & continued killings.

In world of war, support no one, don't support the civilized or the uncivilized man in war. They are both wrong. Support peace.

Who Will Say: What is the Best Solution Regardless of My View

Churches, goovernments , corporations, organization have their own agenda but no one is willing to come to middle ground & see all sides & do & layout the best solution for humanity-for the people.

a comment on Google: Don't Sponsor Bigotry

Re: http://www.change.org/petitions/google-dont-sponsor-bigotry


I wish there was a middle ground for this. There is that option of Freedom of Speech.  Why would, I, a brown person defend their right to free speech? If we limit them, then we are limited too.  It's like someone who is white should have the right to say, "white people great" but not to say "white people are great but all brown/black people or other ethnic people should die." Another aspect is that it is better to know the hate upfront than it being hidden. It is better to be hated with words than killing with hate with hidden agendas. In a way it is good that Google is bringing their voice to the open, maybe then we can have point of discussions. Why do some of the bigots hate people of color-is it because of a personal bullying experience or what they been taught?  It is great to have a variety of cultures and be proud of our heritages as long as we don't hate on someone else's differences. I think that if google is going to sponsor their forum google should also facilitate a discussion about race relations, hate, acceptance, and find out the root cause of hate.   But on the other hand, it is also good to nip terrorism in the bud, because extremisms can be bad. "proud to be brown. proud to be white proud to be black proud to be purple proud to be green proud to be yellow proud to be grey" as long as we don't think that someone of another color is inferior or should be killed. Individuals can be inferior no matter the race or ethnicity OR superior. If Google sponsors this group, then Google also have to ask themselves would they sponsor a group that hated white people? Anyway, why can't these supremacists get with the program and help heal the world and find solutions to help where they are instead of focusing on destruction. We all share this planet, and should be able to peacefully, instead of being reactive all the time about little things.